Kirchhoff’s Rules
By the end of this section, you will be able to:
Many complex circuits, such as the one in Figure 1, cannot be analyzed with the series-parallel techniques developed in Resistors in Series and Parallel and Electromotive Force: Terminal Voltage. There are, however, two circuit analysis rules that can be used to analyze any circuit, simple or complex. These rules are special cases of the laws of conservation of charge and conservation of energy. The rules are known as Kirchhoff’s rules, after their inventor Gustav Kirchhoff (1824–1887).
Explanations of the two rules will now be given, followed by problem-solving hints for applying Kirchhoff’s rules, and a worked example that uses them.
Kirchhoff’s first rule (the junction rule) is an application of the conservation of charge to a junction; it is illustrated in Figure 2. Current is the flow of charge, and charge is conserved; thus, whatever charge flows into the junction must flow out. Kirchhoff’s first rule requires that \(I _{1} = I _{2} + I _{3} \)(see figure). Equations like this can and will be used to analyze circuits and to solve circuit problems.
Kirchhoff’s rules for circuit analysis are applications of conservation laws to circuits. The first rule is the application of conservation of charge, while the second rule is the application of conservation of energy. Conservation laws, even used in a specific application, such as circuit analysis, are so basic as to form the foundation of that application.
Kirchhoff’s second rule (the loop rule) is an application of conservation of energy. The loop rule is stated in terms of potential, \(V\), rather than potential energy, but the two are related since \(\mathrm{PE_{elect}} = qV\). Recall that emf is the potential difference of a source when no current is flowing. In a closed loop, whatever energy is supplied by emf must be transferred into other forms by devices in the loop, since there are no other ways in which energy can be transferred into or out of the circuit. Figure 3 illustrates the changes in potential in a simple series circuit loop.
Kirchhoff’s second rule requires \(\mathrm{emf}-Ir-IR_{1}-IR_{2} = 0\). Rearranged, this is \(\mathrm{emf} = Ir+IR_{1} + IR_{2}\), which means the emf equals the sum of the \(IR\)(voltage) drops in the loop.
By applying Kirchhoff’s rules, we generate equations that allow us to find the unknowns in circuits. The unknowns may be currents, emfs, or resistances. Each time a rule is applied, an equation is produced. If there are as many independent equations as unknowns, then the problem can be solved. There are two decisions you must make when applying Kirchhoff’s rules. These decisions determine the signs of various quantities in the equations you obtain from applying the rules.
Figure 4 and the following points will help you get the plus or minus signs right when applying the loop rule. Note that the resistors and emfs are traversed by going from a to b. In many circuits, it will be necessary to construct more than one loop. In traversing each loop, one needs to be consistent for the sign of the change in potential. (See Example CALCULATING CURRENT: USING KIRCHHOFF’S RULES.)
CALCULATING CURRENT: USING KIRCHHOFF’S RULES
Find the currents flowing in the circuit in Figure 5.
Strategy
This circuit is sufficiently complex that the currents cannot be found using Ohm’s law and the series-parallel techniques—it is necessary to use Kirchhoff’s rules. Currents have been labeled \(I_{1},I_{2}\) and \(I_{3}\) in the figure and assumptions have been made about their directions. Locations on the diagram have been labeled with letters a through h. In the solution we will apply the junction and loop rules, seeking three independent equations to allow us to solve for the three unknown currents.
Solution
We begin by applying Kirchhoff’s first or junction rule at point a. This gives
since \(I_{1}\) flows into the junction, while \(I_{2}\) and \(I_{3}\) flow out. Applying the junction rule at e produces exactly the same equation, so that no new information is obtained. This is a single equation with three unknowns—three independent equations are needed, and so the loop rule must be applied.
Now we consider the loop abcdea. Going from a to b, we traverse \(R_{2}\) in the same (assumed) direction of the current \(I_{2}\), and so the change in potential is \(-I_{2}R_{2}\). Then going from b to c, we go from \(-\) to +, so that the change in potential is \(+\mathrm{emf_{1}}\). Traversing the internal resistance \(r_{1}\) from c to d gives \(-I_{2}r_{1}\). Completing the loop by going from d to a again traverses a resistor in the same direction as its current, giving a change in potential of \(-I_{1}R_{1}\).
The loop rule states that the changes in potential sum to zero. Thus,
Substituting values from the circuit diagram for the resistances and emf, and canceling the ampere unit gives
Now applying the loop rule to aefgha (we could have chosen abcdefgha as well) similarly gives
Note that the signs are reversed compared with the other loop, because elements are traversed in the opposite direction. With values entered, this becomes
These three equations are sufficient to solve for the three unknown currents. First, solve the second equation for \(I_{2}\):
Now solve the third equation for \(I_{3}\):
Substituting these two new equations into the first one allows us to find a value for \(I_{1}\):
Combining terms gives
Substituting this value for \(I_{1}\) back into the fourth equation gives
The minus sign means \(I_{2}\) flows in the direction opposite to that assumed in Figure 5.
Finally, substituting the value for \(I_{1}\) into the fifth equation gives
\(I_{3} = 22.5 - 3I_{1} = 22.5 - 14.25\)
\(I_{3} = 8.25 \thinspace \mathrm{A}.\)
Discussion
Just as a check, we note that indeed \(I_{1} = I_{2}+I_{3}\). The results could also have been checked by entering all of the values into the equation for the abcdefgha loop.
The material in this section is correct in theory. We should be able to verify it by making measurements of current and voltage. In fact, some of the devices used to make such measurements are straightforward applications of the principles covered so far and are explored in the next modules. As we shall see, a very basic, even profound, fact results—making a measurement alters the quantity being measured.
A simple circuit shown below – with two parallel resistors and a voltage source – is implemented in a laboratory experiment with \(\varepsilon = 6.00 \pm 0.002\) V and \(R_{1} = 4.8 \pm 0.1 \Omega\) and \(R_{2} = 9.6 \pm 0.1 \Omega\). The values include an allowance for experimental uncertainties as they cannot be measured with perfect certainty. For example if you measure the value for a resistor a few times, you may get slightly different results. Hence values are expressed with some level of uncertainty.
In the laboratory experiment the currents measured in the two resistors are \(I_{1}= 1.27\) A and \(I_{2}= 0.62\) A respectively. Let us examine these values using Kirchhoff’s laws.
For the two loops,
\(\mathsf{E}-I_{1}R_{1}=0 \thinspace \mathrm{or} \thinspace I_{1}= \mathsf{E}/R_{1}\)
\(\mathsf{E}-I_{2}R_{2}=0 \thinspace \mathrm{or} \thinspace I_{2}= \mathsf{E}/R_{2}\)
Converting the given uncertainties for voltage and resistances into percentages, we get
\(\mathsf{E} = 6.00 \thinspace \mathsf{V} \pm 0.33 \%\)
\(\mathsf{R_{1}} = 4.8 \thinspace \Omega \pm 2.08 \%\)
\(R_{2} = 6.00 \thinspace \Omega \pm 1.04 \%\)
We now find the currents for the two loops. While the voltage is divided by the resistance to find the current, uncertainties in voltage and resistance are directly added to find the uncertainty in the current value.
\(I_{1} = (6.00/4.8) \pm (0.33 \% + 2.08 \%)\)
\(= 1.25 \pm 2.4 \%\)
\(= 1.25 \pm 0.03 \thinspace \mathsf{A}\)
\(I_{2} = (6.00/9.6) \pm (0.33 \% + 1.04 \%)\)
\(= 0.63 \pm 1.4 \%\)
\(= 0.63 \pm 0.01 \mathsf{A}\)
Finally you can check that the two measured values in this case are within the uncertainty ranges found for the currents. However there can also be additional experimental uncertainty in the measurements of currents.
One of the steps to examine the set-up is to test points with the same potential. Which of the following points can be tested?
Apply the junction rule at point abcdefghija in the figure given below.
\(-I_1R_1 + E_1 - I_1r_1 - I_1R_5 - I_3r_4 - E_4 - I_3r_3 +E_3 - I_3R_3 = 0\)
Answer: 0
Based on the given figure, verify the equation \(-3I_2 + 18.0 - 6I_1 = 0\) by substituting the values found for the currents \(I_1\) and \(I_2\).
\(-3(-3.50) + 18.0 - 6(4.75) = 0\) or \(10.5 + 18.0 - 28.5 = 0\)
If I1 = 5 A and I3 = -2 A, I2 will be equal to:
If I1 = 5 A and I3 = -2 A, which of the following statements is false?
Which of the following statements is true?
For this question, consider the circuit shown in the figure below.
Assuming that none of the three currents (I1, I2, and I3) are equal to zero, which of the following statements is false?
The graph shown in figure below is the energy dissipated at R1 as a function of time.
Which of the following shows the graph for energy dissipated at R2 as a function of time?
If the current in the branch with the voltage source is upward and currents in the other two branches are downward, i.e. Ia = Ii + Ic, identify which of the following can be true? Select two answers.
The measurements reveal that the current through R1 is 0.5 A and R3 is 0.6 A. Based on your knowledge of Kirchoff’s laws, confirm which of the following statements are true.
Analyze the given network below.
Given \(R_1=2 \; \Omega\), \(R_2=5 \; \Omega\), \(R_3=6 \; \Omega\), and \(R_4=3 \; \Omega\), compute the total resistance of the network.
\(\Omega\)
Calculate the equivalent resistance of parallel arrangement of resistors:
\({1 \over R_{12}}={1 \over R_1}+{1 \over R_2}={1 \over 2 \; \Omega}+{1 \over 5 \; \Omega}\) and \({1 \over R_{34}}={1 \over R_3}+{1 \over R_4}={1 \over 6 \; \Omega}+{1 \over 3 \; \Omega}\)
\({ R_{12}}=1.4286 \; \Omega\) and \({R_{34}}=2 \; \Omega\)
Since \(R_{12}\) and \(R_{34}\) are connected in series, they must be summed to calculate the total equivalent resistance: \(R_T=R_{12}+R_{34}\)
\(R_T=1.4286 \; \Omega+2 \; \Omega\)
Answer: \(R_T=3.4286 \; \Omega\)
If \(\mathcal{E}=51 \; V\), compute for the total current in the circuit.
\(A\)
\(I={V\over R_T}\)
\(I={51 \; V\over 3.4286 \; \Omega}\)
Answer: \(I=14.875 \; A\)
Solve for \(V_{12}\).
\(V\)
\(V_{12}=(14.875 \; A)(1.4286 \; \Omega)\)
Answer: \(V_{12}=21.25 \; V\)
Solve for \(V_{34}\).
\(V_{34}=(14.875 \; A)(2 \; \Omega)\)
Answer: \(V_{34}=29.75 \; V\)
At which three points should the currents be measured so that Kirchhoff's junction rule can be directly confirmed?At which three points should the currents be measured so that Kirchhoff's junction rule can be directly confirmed?
Find the currents flowing in the circuit in the figure below on your notebook. Explicitly show how you follow the steps in the Problem-Solving Strategies for Series and Parallel Resistors.