1
2
3
4
5
#

Less effort, better results

The all-in-one learning platform built for physics educators and their students.

Lesson Name: Kirchhoff’s Rules

Instructional Block

Kirchhoff’s Rules

LEARNING OBJECTIVES

By the end of this section, you will be able to:

  • Analyze a complex circuit using Kirchhoff’s rules, applying the conventions for determining the correct signs of various terms.

 

INTRODUCTION

Many complex circuits, such as the one in Figure 1, cannot be analyzed with the series-parallel techniques developed in Resistors in Series and Parallel and Electromotive Force: Terminal Voltage. There are, however, two circuit analysis rules that can be used to analyze any circuit, simple or complex. These rules are special cases of the laws of conservation of charge and conservation of energy. The rules are known as Kirchhoff’s rules, after their inventor Gustav Kirchhoff (1824–1887).

Figure 1. This circuit cannot be reduced to a combination of series and parallel connections. Kirchhoff’s rules, special applications of the laws of conservation of charge and energy, can be used to analyze it. (Note: The script E in the figure represents electromotive force, emf.)
KIRCHHOFF'S RULES
  • Kirchhoff’s first rule—the junction rule. The sum of all currents entering a junction must equal the sum of all currents leaving the junction.
  • Kirchhoff’s second rule—the loop rule. The algebraic sum of changes in potential around any closed circuit path (loop) must be zero.

Explanations of the two rules will now be given, followed by problem-solving hints for applying Kirchhoff’s rules, and a worked example that uses them.

KIRCHHOFF'S FIRST RULE

Kirchhoff’s first rule (the junction rule) is an application of the conservation of charge to a junction; it is illustrated in Figure 2. Current is the flow of charge, and charge is conserved; thus, whatever charge flows into the junction must flow out. Kirchhoff’s first rule requires that \(I _{1} = I _{2} + I _{3} \)(see figure). Equations like this can and will be used to analyze circuits and to solve circuit problems.

MAKING CONNECTIONS: CONSERVATION LAWS

Kirchhoff’s rules for circuit analysis are applications of conservation laws to circuits. The first rule is the application of conservation of charge, while the second rule is the application of conservation of energy. Conservation laws, even used in a specific application, such as circuit analysis, are so basic as to form the foundation of that application.


 

Figure 2. The junction rule. The diagram shows an example of Kirchhoff’s first rule where the sum of the currents into a junction equals the sum of the currents out of a junction. In this case, the current going into the junction splits and comes out as two currents, so that \(I_{1} = I_{2} + I_{3}\) 3. Here \(I_{1}\) 1 must be 11 A, since \(I_{2}\) 2 is 7 A and \(I_{3}\) 3 is 4 A.
KIRCHHOFF'S SECOND RULE

Kirchhoff’s second rule (the loop rule) is an application of conservation of energy. The loop rule is stated in terms of potential, \(V\), rather than potential energy, but the two are related since \(\mathrm{PE_{elect}} = qV\). Recall that emf is the potential difference of a source when no current is flowing. In a closed loop, whatever energy is supplied by emf must be transferred into other forms by devices in the loop, since there are no other ways in which energy can be transferred into or out of the circuit. Figure 3 illustrates the changes in potential in a simple series circuit loop.

Kirchhoff’s second rule requires \(\mathrm{emf}-Ir-IR_{1}-IR_{2} = 0\). Rearranged, this is \(\mathrm{emf} = Ir+IR_{1} + IR_{2}\), which means the emf equals the sum of the \(IR\)(voltage) drops in the loop.

Figure 3. The loop rule. An example of Kirchhoff’s second rule where the sum of the changes in potential around a closed loop must be zero. (a) In this standard schematic of a simple series circuit, the emf supplies 18 V, which is reduced to zero by the resistances, with 1 V across the internal resistance, and 12 V and 5 V across the two load resistances, for a total of 18 V. (b) This perspective view represents the potential as something like a roller coaster, where charge is raised in potential by the emf and lowered by the resistances. (Note that the script E stands for emf.)
APPLYING KIRCHHOFF'S RULES

By applying Kirchhoff’s rules, we generate equations that allow us to find the unknowns in circuits. The unknowns may be currents, emfs, or resistances. Each time a rule is applied, an equation is produced. If there are as many independent equations as unknowns, then the problem can be solved. There are two decisions you must make when applying Kirchhoff’s rules. These decisions determine the signs of various quantities in the equations you obtain from applying the rules.

  1. When applying Kirchhoff’s first rule, the junction rule, you must label the current in each branch and decide in what direction it is going. For example, in Figure 1Figure 2, and Figure 3, currents are labeled \(I_{1}, I_{2},I_{3}\) and \(I\), and arrows indicate their directions. There is no risk here, for if you choose the wrong direction, the current will be of the correct magnitude but negative.
  2. When applying Kirchhoff’s second rule, the loop rule, you must identify a closed loop and decide in which direction to go around it, clockwise or counterclockwise. For example, in Figure 3 the loop was traversed in the same direction as the current (clockwise). Again, there is no risk; going around the circuit in the opposite direction reverses the sign of every term in the equation, which is like multiplying both sides of the equation by \(-1\).

Figure 4 and the following points will help you get the plus or minus signs right when applying the loop rule. Note that the resistors and emfs are traversed by going from a to b. In many circuits, it will be necessary to construct more than one loop. In traversing each loop, one needs to be consistent for the sign of the change in potential. (See Example CALCULATING CURRENT: USING KIRCHHOFF’S RULES.)

Figure 4. Each of these resistors and voltage sources is traversed from a to b. The potential changes are shown beneath each element and are explained in the text. (Note that the script E stands for emf.)
  • When a resistor is traversed in the same direction as the current, the change in potential is \(-IR\). (See Figure 4.)
  • When a resistor is traversed in the direction opposite to the current, the change in potential is \(+ IR\). (See Figure 4.)
  • When an emf is traversed from \(-\) to + (the same direction it moves positive charge), the change in potential is +emf. (See Figure 4.)
  • When an emf is traversed from + to \(-\)
     (opposite to the direction it moves positive charge), the change in potential is emf. (See Figure 4.)
EXAMPLE

CALCULATING CURRENT: USING KIRCHHOFF’S RULES

Find the currents flowing in the circuit in Figure 5.

Figure 5. This circuit is similar to that in Figure 1, but the resistances and emfs are specified. (Each emf is denoted by script E.) The currents in each branch are labeled and assumed to move in the directions shown. This example uses Kirchhoff’s rules to find the currents.

Strategy

This circuit is sufficiently complex that the currents cannot be found using Ohm’s law and the series-parallel techniques—it is necessary to use Kirchhoff’s rules. Currents have been labeled \(I_{1},I_{2}\) and \(I_{3}\) in the figure and assumptions have been made about their directions. Locations on the diagram have been labeled with letters a through h. In the solution we will apply the junction and loop rules, seeking three independent equations to allow us to solve for the three unknown currents.

Solution

We begin by applying Kirchhoff’s first or junction rule at point a. This gives

since \(I_{1}\) flows into the junction, while \(I_{2}\) and \(I_{3}\) flow out. Applying the junction rule at e produces exactly the same equation, so that no new information is obtained. This is a single equation with three unknowns—three independent equations are needed, and so the loop rule must be applied.

Now we consider the loop abcdea. Going from a to b, we traverse \(R_{2}\) in the same (assumed) direction of the current \(I_{2}\), and so the change in potential is \(-I_{2}R_{2}\). Then going from b to c, we go from \(-\) to +, so that the change in potential is \(+\mathrm{emf_{1}}\). Traversing the internal resistance \(r_{1}\) from c to d gives \(-I_{2}r_{1}\). Completing the loop by going from d to a again traverses a resistor in the same direction as its current, giving a change in potential of \(-I_{1}R_{1}\).

The loop rule states that the changes in potential sum to zero. Thus,

Substituting values from the circuit diagram for the resistances and emf, and canceling the ampere unit gives

Now applying the loop rule to aefgha (we could have chosen abcdefgha as well) similarly gives

Note that the signs are reversed compared with the other loop, because elements are traversed in the opposite direction. With values entered, this becomes

These three equations are sufficient to solve for the three unknown currents. First, solve the second equation for \(I_{2}\):

Now solve the third equation for \(I_{3}\):

Substituting these two new equations into the first one allows us to find a value for \(I_{1}\):

Combining terms gives

\(I_{1} = 4.75 \thinspace \mathrm{A}.\)

Substituting this value for \(I_{1}\) back into the fourth equation gives

\(I_{2} =3.50 \thinspace \mathrm{A}.\)

The minus sign means \(I_{2}\) flows in the direction opposite to that assumed in Figure 5.

Finally, substituting the value for \(I_{1}\) into the fifth equation gives

\(I_{3} = 22.5 - 3I_{1} = 22.5 - 14.25\)

\(I_{3} = 8.25 \thinspace \mathrm{A}.\)

Discussion

Just as a check, we note that indeed \(I_{1} = I_{2}+I_{3}\). The results could also have been checked by entering all of the values into the equation for the abcdefgha loop.

PROBLEM-SOLVING STRATEGIES FOR KIRCHHOFF'S RULES
  1. Make certain there is a clear circuit diagram on which you can label all known and unknown resistances, emfs, and currents. If a current is unknown, you must assign it a direction. This is necessary for determining the signs of potential changes. If you assign the direction incorrectly, the current will be found to have a negative value—no harm done.
  2. Apply the junction rule to any junction in the circuit. Each time the junction rule is applied, you should get an equation with a current that does not appear in a previous application—if not, then the equation is redundant.
  3. Apply the loop rule to as many loops as needed to solve for the unknowns in the problem. (There must be as many independent equations as unknowns.) To apply the loop rule, you must choose a direction to go around the loop. Then carefully and consistently determine the signs of the potential changes for each element using the four bulleted points discussed above in conjunction with Figure 4.
  4. Solve the simultaneous equations for the unknowns. This may involve many algebraic steps, requiring careful checking and rechecking.
  5. Check to see whether the answers are reasonable and consistent. The numbers should be of the correct order of magnitude, neither exceedingly large nor vanishingly small. The signs should be reasonable—for example, no resistance should be negative. Check to see that the values obtained satisfy the various equations obtained from applying the rules. The currents should satisfy the junction rule, for example.

The material in this section is correct in theory. We should be able to verify it by making measurements of current and voltage. In fact, some of the devices used to make such measurements are straightforward applications of the principles covered so far and are explored in the next modules. As we shall see, a very basic, even profound, fact results—making a measurement alters the quantity being measured.

 

MAKING CONNECTIONS: PARALLEL RESISTORS

A simple circuit shown below – with two parallel resistors and a voltage source – is implemented in a laboratory experiment with \(\varepsilon = 6.00 \pm 0.002\) V and \(R_{1} = 4.8 \pm 0.1 \Omega\) and \(R_{2} = 9.6 \pm 0.1 \Omega\). The values include an allowance for experimental uncertainties as they cannot be measured with perfect certainty. For example if you measure the value for a resistor a few times, you may get slightly different results. Hence values are expressed with some level of uncertainty.

Figure 6

In the laboratory experiment the currents measured in the two resistors are \(I_{1}= 1.27\) A and \(I_{2}= 0.62\) A respectively. Let us examine these values using Kirchhoff’s laws.

For the two loops,

\(\mathsf{E}-I_{1}R_{1}=0 \thinspace \mathrm{or} \thinspace I_{1}= \mathsf{E}/R_{1}\)

\(\mathsf{E}-I_{2}R_{2}=0 \thinspace \mathrm{or} \thinspace I_{2}= \mathsf{E}/R_{2}\)

Converting the given uncertainties for voltage and resistances into percentages, we get

\(\mathsf{E} = 6.00 \thinspace \mathsf{V} \pm 0.33 \%\)

\(\mathsf{R_{1}} = 4.8 \thinspace \Omega \pm 2.08 \%\)

\(R_{2} = 6.00 \thinspace \Omega \pm 1.04 \%\)

We now find the currents for the two loops. While the voltage is divided by the resistance to find the current, uncertainties in voltage and resistance are directly added to find the uncertainty in the current value.

\(I_{1} = (6.00/4.8) \pm (0.33 \% + 2.08 \%)\)

\(= 1.25 \pm 2.4 \%\)

\(= 1.25 \pm 0.03 \thinspace \mathsf{A}\)

\(I_{2} = (6.00/9.6) \pm (0.33 \% + 1.04 \%)\)

\(= 0.63 \pm 1.4 \%\)

\(= 0.63 \pm 0.01 \mathsf{A}\)

Finally you can check that the two measured values in this case are within the uncertainty ranges found for the currents. However there can also be additional experimental uncertainty in the measurements of currents.

No answers found for this question
No hints found for this question

Multiple Choice

One of the steps to examine the set-up is to test points with the same potential. Which of the following points can be tested?

Answer Rubric % Of Choosen
Points f, h, and j. Correct 0 %
Points b, c, and d. In-Correct 0 %
Points a, h, and i. In-Correct 0 %
Points d, e, and f. In-Correct 0 %
No hints found for this question

Numeric

Apply the junction rule at point abcdefghija in the figure given below.

Is correct? Answer (midpoint) Rounding Margin Answer Range Units Wrong Answer Feedback
Correct 0 0 [0,0] -

\(-I_1R_1 + E_1 - I_1r_1 - I_1R_5 - I_3r_4 - E_4 - I_3r_3 +E_3 - I_3R_3 = 0\)

Answer: 0


Numeric

Based on the given figure, verify the equation \(-3I_2 + 18.0 - 6I_1 = 0\) by substituting the values found for the currents \(I_1\) and \(I_2\).

 

Is correct? Answer (midpoint) Rounding Margin Answer Range Units Wrong Answer Feedback
Correct 0 0 [0,0] -

\(-3(-3.50) + 18.0 - 6(4.75) = 0\) or \(10.5 + 18.0 - 28.5 = 0\)

Answer: 0


Multiple Choice

If I1 = 5 A and I3 = -2 A, I2 will be equal to:

Answer Rubric % Of Choosen
3 A In-Correct 0 %
-3 A In-Correct 0 %
7 A In-Correct 0 %
-7 A Correct 0 %
No hints found for this question

Multiple Choice

If I1 = 5 A and I3 = -2 A, which of the following statements is false?

Answer Rubric % Of Choosen
The current through R1 will flow from a to b and will be equal to 5 A.
 
In-Correct 0 %
The current through R3 will flow from a to j and will be equal to 2 A. In-Correct 0 %
The current through R5 will flow from d to e and will be equal to 5 A. In-Correct 0 %
None of the above. Correct 0 %
No hints found for this question

Multiple Choice

Which of the following statements is true?

Answer Rubric % Of Choosen
 E+ E- I1R+ I2R- I1r+ I2r+ I1R= 0 In-Correct 0 %
E- E- I1R+ I2R- I1r+ I2r- I1R= 0 Correct 0 %
- E+ E+ I1R- I2R+ I1r- I2r- I1R= 0 In-Correct 0 %
E+ E+ I1R- I2R+ I1r- I2r+ I1R= 0 In-Correct 0 %
No hints found for this question

Multiple Choice

For this question, consider the circuit shown in the figure below.

Assuming that none of the three currents (I1, I2, and I3) are equal to zero, which of the following statements is false?

Answer Rubric % Of Choosen
I= I+ I2 at point a. In-Correct 0 %
The current through R3 is equal to the current through R5. Correct 0 %
The current through R1 is equal to the current through R5. In-Correct 0 %
I= I- I1 at point e. In-Correct 0 %
No hints found for this question

Multiple Choice

The graph shown in figure below is the energy dissipated at R1 as a function of time.

Which of the following shows the graph for energy dissipated at R2 as a function of time?

Answer Rubric % Of Choosen
In-Correct 0 %
In-Correct 0 %
In-Correct 0 %
Correct 0 %
No hints found for this question

Check All That Apply

If the current in the branch with the voltage source is upward and currents in the other two branches are downward, i.e. Ia = Ii + Ic, identify which of the following can be true? Select two answers.




Answer Rubric % Of Choosen
I= Ih - Ii Correct 0 %
 I= I- Ij Correct 0 %
I= I- Ia In-Correct 0 %
I= Ij - If In-Correct 0 %


Multiple Choice

 

The measurements reveal that the current through R1 is 0.5 A and R3 is 0.6 A. Based on your knowledge of Kirchoff’s laws, confirm which of the following statements are true.

Answer Rubric % Of Choosen
The measured current for R3 is correct but for R1 is incorrect. Correct 0 %
Both the measured currents are incorrect. In-Correct 0 %
Both the measured currents are correct. In-Correct 0 %
The measured current for R1 is correct but for R3 is incorrect. In-Correct 0 %
No hints found for this question

Numeric + Units

Analyze the given network below.

Given \(R_1=2 \; \Omega\),  \(R_2=5 \; \Omega\)\(R_3=6 \; \Omega\), and \(R_4=3 \; \Omega\), compute the total resistance of the network.

Is correct? Answer (midpoint) Rounding Margin Answer Range Units Wrong Answer Feedback
Correct 3.45 0.05 [3.4,3.5]

\(\Omega\)

NULL

Calculate the equivalent resistance of parallel arrangement of resistors:

 

 \({1 \over R_{12}}={1 \over R_1}+{1 \over R_2}={1 \over 2 \; \Omega}+{1 \over 5 \; \Omega}\)  and  \({1 \over R_{34}}={1 \over R_3}+{1 \over R_4}={1 \over 6 \; \Omega}+{1 \over 3 \; \Omega}\)

 \({ R_{12}}=1.4286 \; \Omega\)  and  \({R_{34}}=2 \; \Omega\)

Since \(R_{12}\) and \(R_{34}\)  are connected in series, they must be summed to calculate the total equivalent resistance: \(R_T=R_{12}+R_{34}\)

 \(R_T=1.4286 \; \Omega+2 \; \Omega\)

Answer: \(R_T=3.4286 \; \Omega\)

Numeric + Units

If  \(\mathcal{E}=51 \; V\), compute for the total current in the circuit.

Is correct? Answer (midpoint) Rounding Margin Answer Range Units Wrong Answer Feedback
Correct 14.5 0.5 [14,15]

\(A\)

NULL
\(V=IR_{T}\)

 \(I={V\over R_T}\)

 \(I={51 \; V\over 3.4286 \; \Omega}\)

Answer: \(I=14.875 \; A\)


Numeric + Units

Solve for \(V_{12}\).

Is correct? Answer (midpoint) Rounding Margin Answer Range Units Wrong Answer Feedback
Correct 21.5 1.5 [20,23]

\(V\)

NULL
\(V_{12}=IR_{12}\)

 \(V_{12}=(14.875 \; A)(1.4286 \; \Omega)\)

Answer: \(V_{12}=21.25 \; V\)


Numeric + Units

Solve for \(V_{34}\).

Is correct? Answer (midpoint) Rounding Margin Answer Range Units Wrong Answer Feedback
Correct 29.5 0.5 [29,30]

\(V\)

NULL
\(V_{34}=IR_{34}\)

 \(V_{34}=(14.875 \; A)(2 \; \Omega)\)

Answer: \(V_{34}=29.75 \; V\)



Multiple Choice

At which three points should the currents be measured so that Kirchhoff's junction rule can be directly confirmed?At which three points should the currents be measured so that Kirchhoff's junction rule can be directly confirmed?

Answer Rubric % Of Choosen
Points b, c and d. In-Correct 0 %
Points d, e and f. In-Correct 0 %
Points f, h and j. Correct 0 %
Points a, h and i. In-Correct 0 %
No hints found for this question

Ungraded

Find the currents flowing in the circuit in the figure below on your notebook. Explicitly show how you follow the steps in the Problem-Solving Strategies for Series and Parallel Resistors.

 

 

No answers found for this question
No hints found for this question

Simplify how you teach physics.

Start with Key2PHYSICS, our all-in-one Learning Platform for Physics Educators. It has the tools you need to teach physics—lessons, assessments, and learning reports—all in one place.